3.8 Proceedings Paper

Attentive Group Recommendation

期刊

ACM/SIGIR PROCEEDINGS 2018
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 645-654

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3209978.3209998

关键词

Recommender Systems; Group Recommendation; Attention Mechanism; Neural Collaborative Filtering; Cold-Start Problem

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702176]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2017JJ3038]
  4. Outstanding Youth Science Foundation [61722204]
  5. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under its IRC@SG Funding Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the prevalence of group activities in people's daily life, recommending content to a group of users becomes an important task in many information systems. A fundamental problem in group recommendation is how to aggregate the preferences of group members to infer the decision of a group. Toward this end, we contribute a novel solution, namely AGREE (short for Attentive Group REcommEndation), to address the preference aggregation problem by learning the aggregation strategy from data, which is based on the recent developments of attention network and neural collaborative filtering (NCF). Specifically, we adopt an attention mechanism to adapt the representation of a group, and learn the interaction between groups and items from data under the NCF framework. Moreover, since many group recommender systems also have abundant interactions of individual users on items, we further integrate the modeling of user-item interactions into our method. Through this way, we can reinforce the two tasks of recommending items for both groups and users. By experimenting on two real-world datasets, we demonstrate that our AGREE model not only improves the group recommendation performance but also enhances the recommendation for users, especially for cold-start users that have no historical interactions individually.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据