3.8 Proceedings Paper

Micromechanics-Based Design of Strain Hardening Cementitious Composites (SHCC)

期刊

STRAIN-HARDENING CEMENT-BASED COMPOSITES
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 12-27

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1194-2_2

关键词

Micromechanics; Strain hardening cementitious composites (SHCC); Strain hardening model; Tensile stress-strain model

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation under Environmental & Water Technologies Strategic Research Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the research and development of micromechanics-based design theory of strain hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) at different scale, linking the microstructure at micro scale with the composite tensile behavior at macro scale through fiber bridging properties at meso scale. Micromechanics relates macroscopic properties of SHCC to its microstructures, and forms the theoretical basis of SHCC design theory. So the single fiber pullout behavior at micro level lays the foundation of the scale-up research and has been investigated under various loading conditions. Based on the single fiber pullout behavior, analytic tools on micromechanics-based strain hardening model have been developed in closed or numerical forms. And it is widely applied as design guideline in guiding ingredients selection and component tailoring to achieve desired strain hardening performance. Afterwards, the micromechanics-based concept has been extended to develop models for tensile stress-strain properties and cracking process of SHCC. Therefore, the micromechanics-based design methodology of SHCC becomes holistic in the sense of obtaining the ultimate composite behavior with given micromechanical parameters, and versatile in various SHCC design, i.e. towards durability performance with charactering the crack pattern. It is expected that the micromechanics-based design tools capable of capturing the essence of SHCC behavior, should help structural designers take full advantage of SHCC material in infrastructure system design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据