4.6 Review

Source and sink mechanisms of nitrogen transport and use

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 217, 期 1, 页码 35-53

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14876

关键词

amino acid and ureide partitioning; ammonium and nitrate uptake; crop improvement; inorganic and organic nitrogen transporters; nitrogen storage and remobilization; nitrogen use efficiency; regulation and signaling

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [IOS-1457183]
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2017-67013-26158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plant growth. World-wide, large quantities of nitrogenous fertilizer are applied to ensure maximum crop productivity. However, nitrogen fertilizer application is expensive and negatively affects the environment, and subsequently human health. A strategy to address this problem is the development of crops that are efficient in acquiring and using nitrogen and that can achieve high seed yields with reduced nitrogen input. This review integrates the current knowledge regarding inorganic and organic nitrogen management at the whole-plant level, spanning from nitrogen uptake to remobilization and utilization in source and sink organs. Plant partitioning and transient storage of inorganic and organic nitrogen forms are evaluated, as is how they affect nitrogen availability, metabolism and mobilization. Essential functions of nitrogen transporters in source and sink organs and their importance in regulating nitrogen movement in support of metabolism, and vegetative and reproductive growth are assessed. Finally, we discuss recent advances in plant engineering, demonstrating that nitrogen transporters are effective targets to improve crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency. While inorganic and organic nitrogen transporters were examined separately in these studies, they provide valuable clues about how to successfully combine approaches for future crop engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据