4.1 Article

Hearing laughter improves the recovery process of the autonomic nervous system after a stress-loading task: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13030-018-0141-0

关键词

Stress; Relaxation; Laughter; Heart rate variability; Inter-beat intervals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundIt has become necessary to develop mental health management methods that do not require specialized skills or tools to implement. With this in mind, we performed a subjective and objective investigation of the stress-reducing effect of hearing laughter.MethodsNinety healthy students were randomly assigned to a laughter (n=45) or rest (n=45) group. Both groups were then administered the Uchida-Kraepelin test for 15min, which served as a stress-loading method. The laughter group listened to a specially prepared CD for five minutes, while the rest group rested for five minutes. The participants' subjective stress level was assessed using a visual analogue scale and their physiological status was assessed by measuring blood pressure and monitoring heart rate variability.ResultsThe visual analogue scale score for subjective stress was found to decrease significantly in both the laughter and rest groups after the intervention. However, a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significant interaction and main effects for the change in heart rate and the natural logarithm of the high-frequency component of heart rate variability (lnHF). A post-hoc analysis using Dunnett's test showed that hearing laughter caused the lnHF to significantly increase compared to that recorded during the Uchida-Kraepelin test and the rest period.ConclusionsThese results suggest that hearing laughter might produce a relaxing effect by increasing parasympathetic nervous activity. This would make it an easily accessible method for improving the recovery process of the autonomic nervous system after a stress-loading task that does not require specialized skills or tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据