4.6 Article

Target of rapamycin signaling orchestrates growth-defense trade-offs in plants

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 217, 期 1, 页码 305-319

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14785

关键词

growth-defense trade-offs; jasmonic acid; plant defense; rice (Oryza sativa); salicylic acid; target of rapamycin (TOR)

资金

  1. Special Research Fund of Ghent University [GOA 01GB3013]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders [FWO G.0833.12N]
  3. National Institute of Health (NIH) [GM55962]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOS-081773]
  5. Hercules Foundation of the Flemish Government [AUGE/11/016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant defense to microbial pathogens is often accompanied by significant growth inhibition. How plants merge immune system function with normal growth and development is still poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of target of rapamycin (TOR), an evolutionary conserved serine/threonine kinase, in the plant defense response. We used rice as a model system and applied a combination of chemical, genetic, genomic and cell-based analyses. We demonstrate that ectopic expression of TOR and Raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mTOR), a protein previously demonstrated to interact with TOR in Arabidopsis, positively regulates growth and development in rice. Transcriptome analysis of rice cells treated with the TOR-specific inhibitor rapamycin revealed that TOR not only dictates transcriptional reprogramming of extensive gene sets involved in central and secondary metabolism, cell cycle and transcription, but also suppresses many defense-related genes. TOR overexpression lines displayed increased susceptibility to both bacterial and fungal pathogens, whereas plants with reduced TOR signaling displayed enhanced resistance. Finally, we found that TOR antagonizes the action of the classic defense hormones salicylic acid and jasmonic acid. Together, these results indicate that TOR acts as a molecular switch for the activation of cell proliferation and plant growth at the expense of cellular immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据