4.6 Article

PacBio metabarcoding of Fungi and other eukaryotes: errors, biases and perspectives

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 217, 期 3, 页码 1370-1385

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14776

关键词

amplification bias; bioinformatics pipeline; dual-indexing; long DNA barcodes; Pacific Biosciences SMRT cell sequencing; Sequel instrument; sequencing errors; tag switching

资金

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [PUT1399, MOBERC1]
  2. 'Functional Genomics' program of the Research Council of Norway
  3. 'Infrastructure' program of the Research Council of Norway
  4. Southeastern Regional Health Authorities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Second-generation, high-throughput sequencing methods have greatly improved our understanding of the ecology of soil microorganisms, yet the short barcodes (< 500 bp) provide limited taxonomic and phylogenetic information for species discrimination and taxonomic assignment. Here, we utilized the third-generation Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) RSII and Sequel instruments to evaluate the suitability of full-length internal transcribed spacer (ITS) barcodes and longer rRNA gene amplicons for metabarcoding Fungi, Oomycetes and other eukaryotes in soil samples. Metabarcoding revealed multiple errors and biases: Taq polymerase substitution errors and mis-incorporating indels in sequencing homopolymers constitute major errors; sequence length biases occur during PCR, library preparation, loading to the sequencing instrument and quality filtering; primer-template mismatches bias the taxonomic profile when using regular and highly degenerate primers. The RSII and Sequel platforms enable the sequencing of amplicons up to 3000 bp, but the sequence quality remains slightly inferior to Illumina sequencing especially in longer amplicons. The full ITS barcode and flanking rRNA small subunit gene greatly improve taxonomic identification at the species and phylum levels, respectively. We conclude that PacBio sequencing provides a viable alternative for metabarcoding of organisms that are of relatively low diversity, require > 500-bp barcode for reliable identification or when phylogenetic approaches are intended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据