4.6 Review

Life and death of proteins after protease cleavage: protein degradation by the N-end rule pathway

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 218, 期 3, 页码 929-935

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14619

关键词

arginylation; cysteine oxidation; N-degron; N-end rule pathway; N-recognins; N-terminomics; proteases; ubiquitin-proteasome system

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [13/IA/1870]
  2. Virtual Irish Centre for Crop Improvement (VICCI
  3. Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine) [14/S/819]
  4. ScienceCampus Halle - Plant-based Bioeconomy
  5. Research Focus Program 'Molecular biosciences as a motor for a knowledge-based economy' from the European Regional Development Fund [LSP-TP2-1]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [DI 1794/3-1]
  7. DFG Graduate Training Center [GRK1026]
  8. French Laboratory of Excellence project 'TULIP' [ANR-10-LABX-41, ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02]
  9. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/IA/1870] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The N-end rule relates the stability of a protein to the identity of its N-terminal residue and some of its modifications. Since its discovery in the 1980s, the repertoire of N-terminal degradation signals has expanded, leading to a diversity of N-end rule pathways. Although some of these newly discovered N-end rule pathways remain largely unexplored in plants, recent discoveries have highlighted roles of N-end rule-mediated protein degradation in plant defense against pathogens and in cell proliferation during organ growth. Despite this progress, a bottleneck remains the proteome-wide identification of N-end rule substrates due to the prerequisite for endoproteolytic cleavage and technical limitations. Here, we discuss the recent diversification of N-end rule pathways and their newly discovered functions in plant defenses, stressing the role of proteases. We expect that novel proteomics techniques (N-terminomics) will be essential for substrate identification. We review these methods, their limitations and future developments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据