4.6 Article

Fine-scale species distribution changes in a mixed oak stand over two successive generations

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 215, 期 1, 页码 126-139

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14561

关键词

admixture; demography; Quercus petraea; Quercus robur; recruitment; regeneration phase

资金

  1. European Research Council through the Advanced Grant Project TREEPEACE [FP-7339728]
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the 'Investissements d'Avenir' programme, Labex ARBRE
  3. French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the 'Investissements d'Avenir' programme, Labex COTE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale tree distribution changes have received considerable attention but underlying demo-genetic mechanisms are less well documented. We used a diachronic approach to track species shifts in a mixed oak stand (Quercus petraea-Quercus robur) at a fine spatiotemporal scale. Species assignment was made using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) fingerprints employing clustering and parentage analysis. Mating patterns and reproductive success were assessed by parentage analysis. Plot-based inventories of soil parameters and sapling densities provided ecological and demographic information, respectively. Sapling density and reproductive success was higher in Q. petraea than in Q. robur, and were correlated with a spatial expansion of Q. petraea (50% to 67% of the area). Admixed trees resulting from hybridization and backcrossing between the two species were more frequent under the Q. robur canopy. We suspect that species' differential responses to ongoing environmental changes and interspecific competition are the predominant factors accounting for the recruitment success of Q. petraea, while human interference, differential reproduction and hybridization (and backcrossings) are probably of more limited importance. We anticipate in mixed Q. petraea-Q. robur stands, under current ongoing environmental change, that these processes will be enhanced, at least in the western part of the distribution of the two species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据