4.6 Article

A novel multi-nitrogen 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane-based energetic co-crystal with 1-methyl-3,4,5-trinitropyrazole as a donor: experimental and theoretical investigations of intermolecular interactions

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 4165-4172

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nj03976f

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSAF Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. China Academy of Engineering Physics [U1530262]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11402237, 11302200]
  4. Science and Technology Foundation of CAEP [2015B0302055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel multi-nitrogen energetic cocrystal, 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20), with 1-methyl-3,4,5-trinitropyrazole (MTNP) as a donor, in a 1 : 1 molar ratio was prepared and characterized by X-ray diffraction. Instead of traditional aromatic donors such as 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene (TNB), multi-nitrogen azole compound was introduced in this study. CL-20: MTNP has a high crystal density of 1.932 g cm(-3) at 293(2) K and superior detonation performance (nu(D) = 9347 m s(-1), P = 40.5 GPa) due to its high heat of formation, nitrogen content, and oxygen balance. Moreover, measured impact and friction sensitivities (IS = 6 J, FS = 180 N) show that it is more insensitive than CL-20, close to those of RDX and HMX. To analyze the intermolecular interaction of CL-20:MTNP, a series of theoretical analyses was employed including Hirshfeld surface analysis, non-covalent interaction plots, interaction energy calculations, and electrostatic surface potential distributions. The physicochemical performance implies that CL-20:MTNP can serve as a promising energetic material, and the methyl-substituted low-point explosives, acting as donor-acceptor, can be a new strategy for constructing a series of novel multi-nitrogen energetic cocrystals towards future high-performance energetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据