4.5 Article

LOW VITAMIN D STATUS IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED THYROTROPIN-RECEPTOR ANTIBODY TITER IN GRAVES DISEASE

期刊

ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 258-263

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4158/EP14191.OR

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072219, 81272973, 81471055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Vitamin D deficiency is reportedly linked to a variety of autoimmune diseases. However, the relationship between thyroid autoimmunity in Graves disease (GD) and vitamin D deficiency is unclear. The goal of this study was to determine whether increased thyroid hormone autoantibody titer is associated with vitamin D deficiency in GD patients. Methods: A total of 70 patients with GD and 70 matched control subjects were recruited to our study. The levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[ OH] D), calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyrotropin-receptor antibody (TRAb), thyroid-peroxidase antibody (TPOAb), and thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) in serum collected from these patients and controls were examined. Results: The level of 25(OH) D in serum from TRAb-positive GD patients was significantly lower than that in serum of healthy controls or TRAb-negative patients. However, compared with control subjects, the level of PTH in serum was increased in TRAb-positive GD patients. The rate of vitamin D deficiency (defined as serum 25[ OH] D <50 nmol/L) in TRAb-positive GD patients was significantly higher than in healthy controls or TRAb-negative GD patients. The level of 25(OH) D in serum was inversely correlated with TRAb titer in serum of TRAb-positive GD patients. However, our results did not show a correlation between 25(OH) D level and the levels of TPOAb, TGAb, FT3, FT4, or TSH. Conclusion: Low vitamin D status is associated with increased TRAb titer in GD, suggesting a possible link between vitamin D status and increased thyroid autoimmunity in GD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据