4.6 Article

Role of graphene oxide in mitigated toxicity of heavy metal ions on Daphnia magna

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 72, 页码 41358-41367

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra09135h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91547105, 51779076]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421006]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [2016-JNHB-007]
  5. 333 Talent Project Foundation of Jiangsu Province
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018B47814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO) is increasingly used and inevitably released into aquatic environments, facilitating its interaction with traditional pollutants such as heavy metal ions. However, the potential effect of GO on the toxicity of heavy metal ions to aquatic animals is unknown. This work aims to assess the toxicity of heavy metal ions (Cu(ii), Cd(ii), and Zn(ii)) on Daphnia magna (D. magna) in the presence of GO. GO nanoparticles remarkably reduced the concentrations of heavy metal ions by adsorption and decreased the metal accumulation in D. magna. The maximum desorption rate of heavy metal ions from metal-adsorbed GO was below 5%. At pH 7.8, with addition of 2 mg L-1 GO, the 72 h median lethal concentration (LC50) values of Cu(ii), Cd(ii), and Zn(ii) were increased from 14.3, 38, and 780 g L-1 to 36.6, 72, and 1010 g L-1, respectively. The analyses of oxidative stress indicators suggested that the oxidative damage to D. magna by heavy metal ions was reduced after addition of GO at pH 7.8. Moreover, a higher pH level in the growing range (6.5 to 8.5) of D. magna led to weaker toxicity of metal ions with GO addition due to more adsorption and less bioaccumulation. The results revealed the role of GO nanoparticles in the mitigated toxicity of heavy metal ions in the aquatic environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据