4.8 Article

Evacetrapib and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Disease

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 376, 期 20, 页码 1933-1942

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609581

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eli Lilly
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Roche
  4. CSL Behring
  5. Esperion
  6. AbbVie
  7. Amgen
  8. Cerenis
  9. Novartis
  10. Resverlogix
  11. Sanofi-Regeneron
  12. Medicines Company
  13. Merck
  14. Boehringer Ingelheim
  15. Pfizer
  16. DeZima Pharma
  17. Bayer/Janssen
  18. Armetheon
  19. Bayer
  20. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  21. Daiichi-Sankyo
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  24. Medtronic Foundation
  25. Boston Scientific
  26. Gilead Sciences
  27. Hoffmann-La Roche
  28. Medtronic
  29. Verseon
  30. Association pour le Developpement Industriel de la Reunion
  31. Celladon
  32. Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition
  33. Federation Francaise de Cardiologie
  34. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  35. Sanofi-Aventis
  36. Berlin Chimie
  37. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  38. Brigham and Women's Hospital
  39. Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  40. CME Resources, Europa
  41. Elsevier
  42. Fondazione Anna Maria Sechi per il Cuore
  43. Janssen
  44. Lead-Up
  45. Menarini
  46. TIMI Study Group
  47. WebMD
  48. MedImmune
  49. Janssen Research and Development
  50. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America
  51. Eisai
  52. Sanofi US
  53. Servier
  54. Sanofi
  55. Valeant
  56. Dalcor
  57. Theracos
  58. Esperion Therapeutics
  59. Amarin Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib substantially raises the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, reduces the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, and enhances cellular cholesterol efflux capacity. We sought to determine the effect of evacetrapib on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high-risk vascular disease. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled 12,092 patients who had at least one of the following conditions: an acute coronary syndrome within the previous 30 to 365 days, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular arterial disease, or diabetes mellitus with coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either evacetrapib at a dose of 130 mg or matching placebo, administered daily, in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was the first occurrence of any component of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS At 3 months, a 31.1% decrease in the mean LDL cholesterol level was observed with evacetrapib versus a 6.0% increase with placebo, and a 133.2% increase in the mean HDL cholesterol level was seen with evacetrapib versus a 1.6% increase with placebo. After 1363 of the planned 1670 primary end-point events had occurred, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial be terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. After a median of 26 months of evacetrapib or placebo, a primary end-point event occurred in 12.9% of the patients in the evacetrapib group and in 12.8% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.11; P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS Although the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib had favorable effects on established lipid biomarkers, treatment with evacetrapib did not result in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease. (Funded by Eli Lilly; ACCELERATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01687998.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据