4.6 Review

Modeling neurodegenerative diseases with patient-derived induced pluripotent cells: Possibilities and challenges

期刊

NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 190-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.05.009

关键词

IPSC; Neurodegeneration; Disease models; Alzheimer's disease; Frontotemporal dementia; Ataxia; 3D neural cultures; 2D neural cultures

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Mahidol University
  3. European Union [PIAP-GA-2012-324451-STEMMAD]
  4. Innovation Fund Denmark [4108-00008B, 4096-00001B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rising prevalence of progressive neurodegenerative diseases coupled with increasing longevity poses an economic burden at individual and societal levels. There is currently no effective cure for the majority of neurodegenerative diseases and disease-affected tissues from patients have been difficult to obtain for research and drug discovery in pre-clinical settings. While the use of animal models has contributed invaluable mechanistic insights and potential therapeutic targets, the translational value of animal models could be further enhanced when combined with in vitro models derived from patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and isogenic controls generated using CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing. The iPSCs are self-renewable and capable of being differentiated into the cell types affected by the diseases. These in vitro models based on patient-derived iPSCs provide the opportunity to model disease development, uncover novel mechanisms and test potential therapeutics. Here we review findings from iPSC-based modeling of selected neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and spinocerebellar ataxia. Furthermore, we discuss the possibilities of generating three-dimensional (3D) models using the iPSCs-derived cells and compare their advantages and disadvantages to conventional two-dimensional (2D) models. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据