4.1 Article

Development of a Simple Risk Score Model to Predict Renal Artery Stenosis

期刊

NEPHRON
卷 140, 期 4, 页码 257-264

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000492732

关键词

Renal artery stenosis; Angiography; Prediction; Risk score model

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences & Health services grant [18079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a known cause of secondary hypertension and renal failure. Although renal artery angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing RAS, a simple method to estimate if patients will develop RAS is required. The aim of this retrospective study was to develop a simple risk score to predict significant RAS. Methods: Four thousand one hundred seventy-seven patients who underwent renal angiography between 2002 and 2016 at Tehran Heart Center were included. Significant RAS was defined as narrowing of the renal artery by at least 70%. Multiple predictors of the RAS were determined using multivariable logistic regression with a backward elimination method. The scoring system obtained from the final model was presented as nomogram. The possible nonlinear effect of continuous variables was evaluated using restricted cubic splines. Overfitting of the final model was assessed applying the tenfold cross-validation method. Model performance was checked using calibration plot as well as Hosmer-Leme-show goodness of fit test, and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Results: The prevalence of RAS was 14.1%. Female sex (OR [95% CI]: 1.53 [1.26-1.85]), hypertension (OR [95% CI]: 1.38 [1.08-1.77]), estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.97-0.98]), body mass index (OR [95% CI]: 0.97 [0.95-0.99]), and age (OR [95% CI]: 1.01 [1.00-1.02]) were determined as the multiple predictors of RAS. The area under the ROC curve of the final predictive model was 0.702 (95% CI: 0.679-0.725). Conclusion: This model assesses the risk of RAS using available information. This model can be used for both clinical and research purposes. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据