4.7 Article

Performance optimisation of microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and sustainable clean energy generation using response surface methodology

期刊

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 4243-4253

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2018.02.012

关键词

Wastewater treatment; Sustainable energy; Microbial fuel cell; Optimisation; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. Petroleum Engineering Department of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS [STIRF-0153AA-F81]
  2. King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) of Saud Arabia [1-2015 KACST-ITM-CNR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, response surface methodology (RSM), coupled with central composite design (CCD), are applied to optimise the performance of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) as a function of three main factors of commercialisation. Pt, as the main obstacle for commercialisation in the range of 0.1-0.5 mg/cm(2), degree of sulphonation in SPEEK, as a new proton exchange membrane in the range of 20-80%, and rate of aeration of cathode between 10 and 150 ml/min were optimised to identify a more commercial MFC. The single maximum response of power density and COD removal and simultaneous maximisation of both responses were obtained at the corresponding optimal independent variables. The results show that the optimised condition for power density and COD removal is at DS 68% and aeration of 121.62 ml/min. However, the pt load differs and is 0.42 mg/cm(2) for produced power density and 0.28 mg/cm(2) for COD removal. The maximum produced power density in the optimised situation was 58.19 mW/m(2) while the maximum COD removal in the optimised condition was 94.8%. However, once we optimised both at the same time i. e., the power generation and COD removal, the degree of sulphonation (DS) was 68%, Pt load was 0.35 mg/cm(2) and the aeration rate was 121.62 ml/min, which resulted in a power production of about 57.06 mW/m(2) and COD removal of 92.7%. (C) 2018 Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据