4.4 Article

Quantification of Different Forms of Iron from Intact Soil Cores of Paddy Fields with Vis-NIR Spectroscopy

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 82, 期 6, 页码 1497-1511

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2018.01.0014

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771253]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0503906]
  3. 135 Plan and Frontier Fields Program of the Institute of Soil Science [ISSASIP1651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron (Fe) occurs in almost all soils and the analysis of various forms of Fe in the soil is of great pedological interest. Very little is known, however, about how visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy performs in intact soil cores of paddy fields for quantifying Fe concentrations. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of Vis-NIR spectroscopy of intact soil cores for rapid determination of the four Fe forms: total Fe (Fe-t), pyrophosphate-extractable Fe (Fe-p), dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractable Fe (Fe-d), and oxalate-extractable Fe (Fe-o). A total of 148 intact soil cores in Yujiang County, China, were sampled, and Vis-NIR spectra (350-2500 nm) were sectioned and scanned on four horizontal surfaces (5-cm depth intervals) of each soil core in the laboratory. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) models were compared using 70% of the section samples for calibration and 30% for independent validation. Results showed that the nonlinear SVMR models performed better than the PLSR models for the predictions of all Fe forms. The SVMR models produced the best predictions in the independent validation set for Fe-d (RMSEP = 2.223; R-P(2) = 0.88; RPDP = 2.86), Fe-o (RMSEP = 0.994; R-P(2) = 0.85; RPDP = 2.59), Fe-t (RMSEP = 3.693; R-P(2) = 0.82; RPDP = 2.32), and Fe-p (RMSEP = 0.086; R-P(2) = 0.79; RPDP = 2.17). It was concluded that Vis-NIR spectroscopy coupled with SVMR is suitable for quantitatively determining different Fe forms in intact soil cores of paddy fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据