4.4 Article

The glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX and MPEP decrease fast ripple events in rats treated with kainic acid

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 655, 期 -, 页码 137-142

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.056

关键词

CNQX; Fast ripples; Hippocampus; Kainic acid; MPEP; Status epilepticus

资金

  1. [CONACYT-SEP-CB250930]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast ripples (FR) are high frequency oscillations (250-600 Hz) that have been associated with epilepsy. FR are assumed to be generated in small areas of the hippocampus (1 mm(3)) that contain pathologically interconnected glutamate pyramidal cell clusters. Additionally, a relation between glutamate neurotransmission and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid/kainite (AMPA/KA) and metabotropic mGluR5 receptors is well established. Therefore, we hypothesized that antagonism of these glutamate receptors would decrease FR activity. For this propose, we induced status epilepticus with a kainic acid injection in the posterior right hippocampus and performed intracranial EEG recordings to detect and evaluate the presence of FR 15 days after the injection. The glutamate AMPA/KA receptor antagonist CNQX (10 mg/kg) and the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (20 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally, and the effects of the drugs were evaluated for a period of three hours after their administration. The results show a decrease in the number of FR in the first hour after drug administration in both cases (CNQX, p = 0.0125; MPEP, p = 0.0132) and a return to basal values in the third hour of the experiment, but not significant differences in the number of oscillations per event of FR, and the frequency and duration of each event of FR. We therefore conclude that blockade of AMPA/KA and mGluR5 receptors transiently decreases the generation of FR; however, the mechanisms by which this effect is achieved are to be further analyzed in future experiments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据