4.4 Article

Therapeutic hypothermia attenuates global cerebral reperfusion-induced mitochondrial damage by suppressing dynamin-related protein 1 activation and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in a cardiac arrest rat model

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 647, 期 -, 页码 45-52

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.065

关键词

Ischemia/reperfusion injury; Therapeutic hypothermia; Mitochondrial fission; Cardiac arrest; Apoptosis; Drp1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671884]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic hypothermia is effective to attenuate brain ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury after cardiac arrest, and multiple mechanisms have been proposed. Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a large GTPases of dynamin superfamily, predominantly controls mitochondrial fission and is related to IR-induced Cyt C release and apoptosis. However, the effect of therapeutic hypothermia on Drpl and mitochondrial fission after cardiac arrest remains still unclear. In this study, non-cardiac arrest and post-cardiac arrest rats received 6-h normothermia (37-38 degrees C) or therapeutic hypothermia (32-34 degrees C), and the hippocampus was harvested at 6 h and 72 h after cardiac arrest. Results showed the expression of Drpl and Cyt C increased after cardiac arrest, but therapeutic hypothermia partially reversed this increase at 6 h after cardiac arrest. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) also showed a change in morphology following therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Moreover, therapeutic hypothermia could decrease the histopathological damage, inhibit the apoptosis of CA1 neurons and improve the survival and neurological outcomes at 72 h after cardiac arrest. Taken together, our study demonstrates that therapeutic hypothermia is neuroprotective against global cerebral liR injury, which is, at least partially, ascribed to the inhibition Drpl and Cyt C expression and the protection of mitochondrial structure. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据