4.4 Article

A pilot study of cell-mediated gene therapy for spinal cord injury in mini pigs

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 644, 期 -, 页码 67-75

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.034

关键词

Cell-mediated gene therapy; Adenoviral vector; Spinal cord injury; Mini pigs; Human umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell; Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF); Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM)

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-15-00010]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-15-00010] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, in clinical practice there is no efficient way to overcome the sequences of neurodegeneration after spinal cord traumatic injury. Using a new experimental model of spinal cord contusion injury on miniature pigs, we proposed to deliver therapeutic genes encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) to the damaged area, using umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells (UCBC). In this study, genetically engineered UCBC (2 x 10(6) cells in 200 ml of saline) were injected intrathecally to mini-pigs 10 days after SO. Control and experimental mini pigs were observed for 60 days after surgery. Histological, electrophysio-logical, and clinical evaluation demonstrated significant improvement in animal treated with genetically engineered UCBCs. Difference in recovery of the somatosensory evoked potentials and in histological findings in control and treated animals support the positive effect of the gene-cell constriction for recovery after spinal cord injury. Results of this study suggest that transplantation of UCBCs simultaneously transduced with three recombinant adenoviruses Ad5-VEGF, Ad5-GDNF and Ad5-NCAM represent a novel potentially successful approach for treatment of spinal cord injury. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据