4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Social modulation of cognition: Lessons from rhesus macaques relevant to education

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 45-57

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.002

关键词

Social cognition; Social facilitation; Observational learning; Neuroeducation; Monkeys; Learning from mistakes; Peers' presence

资金

  1. European Union (Marie-Curie Carreer Integration) [PCIG12-GA-2012-333602]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE13-0005-1, ANR-14-CE30-0002-01]
  3. LABEX CORTEX of Lyon University within program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR-11-IDEX-0007]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE13-0005] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Any animal, human or non-human, lives in a world where there are others like itself. Individuals' behaviors are thus inevitably influenced by others, and cognition is no exception. Long acknowledged in psychology, social modulations of cognition have been neglected in cognitive neuroscience. Yet, infusing this classic topic in psychology with brain science methodologies could yield valuable educational insights. In recent studies, we used a non-human primate model, the rhesus macaque, to identify social influences representing ancient biases rooted in evolution, and neuroimaging to shed light on underlying mechanisms. The behavioral and neural data garnered in humans and macaques are summarized, with a focus on two findings relevant to human education. First, peers' mistakes stand out as exceptional professors and seem to have devoted areas and neurons in the primates' brain. Second, peers' mere presence suffices to enhance performance in well-learned tasks, possibly by boosting activity in the brain network involved in the task at hand. These findings could be translated into concrete pedagogical interventions in the classroom. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据