4.5 Article

SUBCELLULAR EXPRESSION OF AQUAPORIN-4 IN SUBSTANTIA NIGRA OF NORMAL AND MPTP-TREATED MICE

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 359, 期 -, 页码 258-266

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.029

关键词

aquaporin-4; astrocyte; MPTP; Parkinson's disease; immunogold histochemistry

资金

  1. University of Oslo - Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is the predominant water channel in mammalian CNS where it is localized at the perivascular astrocytic foot processes abutting brain microvessels. Several lines of evidence suggest that AQP4 is involved in important homeostatic functions and that mislocalization of the perivascular pool of AQP4 is implicated in several different brain disorders. A recent study suggests that the differential susceptibility of midbrain dopaminergic neurons to the parkinsonogenic toxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) depends on the expression of AQP4. Further, MRI studies of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) point to an excessive water accumulation in the substantia nigra (SN). This prompted us to investigate the cellular and subcellular distribution of AQP4 in mouse SN using immunofluorescence and quantitative immunogold cytochemistry. Compared with neocortex, SN exhibits a higher concentration of AQP4. Specifically, judged by electron microscopic immunogold analysis, the perivascular density of AQP4 in SN exceeds by 70% the perivascular density of AQP4 in the neocortex. An even larger difference in AQP4 labeling was found for astrocytic processes in the neuropil. Treatment with MPTP further increased (by >30%) the perivascular AQP4 density in SN, but also increased AQP4 labeling in the neocortex. Our data indicate that the perivascular AQP4 pool in SN is high in normal animals and even higher after treatment with MPTP. This would leave the SN more prone to water accumulation and supports the idea that AQP4 could be involved in the pathogenesis of PD. (C) 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据