4.5 Review

ROLE OF CHOROID PLEXUS IN CEREBROSPINAL FLUID HYDRODYNAMICS

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 69-87

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.025

关键词

cerebrospinal fluid; choroid plexus; classical hypothesis of cerebrospinal fluid physiology; hydrocephalus; Intracranial pressure; Bulat-Klarica-Oreskovic hypothesis

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia [IP-2014-09-7827, 108-1080231-0023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The classic hypothesis presents the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as the third circulation, which flows from the brain ventricles through the entire CSF system to the cortical subarachnoid space to eventually be passively absorbed into the superior sagittal sinus through arachnoid granulations. The choroid plexus (CP) represents a key organ in the classic CSF physiology and a powerful biological pump, which exclusively secretes CSF. Thereby, the CP is considered to be responsible for CSF pressure regulation and hydrocephalus development. This article thoroughly analyzes the role of the CP in the CSF dynamics, presenting arguments in favor of the thesis that the CPs are neither biological pumps nor the main site of CSF secretion; that they do not participate in regulation of ICP/CSF pressure; are not the reason for the existence of hydrostatic pressure gradient in the CSF system and that this gradient is not permanent (disappeared in the horizontal position); and that they do not generate imagined unidirectional CSF circulation, hydrocephalus development and increased ICP/CSF pressure. The classic hypothesis cannot provide an explanation for these controversies but the recently formulated Bulat-K larica-Oreskovic hypothesis can. According to this hypothesis, CSF production and absorption (CSF exchange) are constant and present everywhere in the CSF system, and although the CSF is partially produced by the CP, it is mainly formed as a consequence of water filtration between the capillaries and interstitial fluid. (C) 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据