4.5 Article

AN ALTERED BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER CONTRIBUTES TO BRAIN IRON ACCUMULATION AND NEUROINFLAMMATION IN THE 6-OHDA RAT MODEL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 141-151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.08.023

关键词

brain-iron; 6-OHDA; MRI; blood-brain barrier; microglia

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR-M grant) [09917]
  2. Ahlen Foundation
  3. Swedish Brain Foundation (Hjarnfonden)
  4. Umea University Medical Faculty Foundations
  5. Strategic Neuroscience Program Umea University-Karolinska Institute (StratNeuro)
  6. 7th Framework European Programme (Capacities) [FP7-REGPOT-2012-CT2012-31637-IMBRAIN]
  7. ACIISI [TESIS2015010082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain iron accumulation is a common feature shared by several neurodegenerative disorders including Parkinson's disease. However, what produces this accumulation of iron is still unknown. In this study, the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) hemi-parkinsonian rat model was used to investigate abnormal iron accumulation in substantia nigra. We investigated three possible causes of iron accumulation; a compromised blood-brain barrier (BBB), abnormal expression of ferritin, and neuroinflammation. We identified alterations in the BBB subsequent to the injection of 6-OHDA using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Moreover, detection of extravasated IgG suggested that peripheral components are able to enter the brain through a leaky BBB. Presence of iron following dopamine cell degeneration was studied by MRI, which revealed hypointense signals in the substantia nigra. The presence of iron deposits was further validated in histological evaluations. Furthermore, iron inclusions were closely associated with active microglia and with increased levels of L-ferritin indicating a putative role for microglia and L-ferritin in brain iron accumulation and dopamine neurodegeneration. (C) 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据