4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic Limitations on Effects of an Alpha7-Nicotinic Receptor Agonist in Schizophrenia: Randomized Trial with an Extended-Release Formulation

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 583-589

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.182

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [P50MH086383]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the trial was to assess whether extending plasma levels of the alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist 3-(2,4-dimethoxybenzylidene)- anabaseine (DMXB-A) over time enhances its cognitive effects in schizophrenia. Both smoking and non-smoking patients were studied, to determine whether effects differ between these two groups. Forty-three smokers and thirty-seven non-smokers who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 1 month trial. DMXB-A 150 mg was formulated with hypromellose to produce extended release over 4 h and administered four times daily. The primary outcome (the Neurocognitive Composite of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery) and secondary outcomes (the MATRICS Attention-Vigilance Domain and P50 gating), showed no significant effect. Plasma levels were obtained 2.5 h post administration. In non-smokers, levels were similar to those reached transiently with 75-150 mg DMXB-A immediate-release formulations twice daily, which were earlier shown to be effective doses. However, the extended-release formulation produced no cognitive or clinical effect either in non-smokers or smokers. The 10-fold lower DMXB-A plasma levels in smokers suggest that chronic smoking enhances DMXB-A metabolism. Pro-cognitive effects of DMXB-A may result from transient increases in cell signaling that are limited by receptor tachyphylaxis. Future efforts to improve cognition in schizophrenia by enhancing alpha7 nAChR function may require consideration of these pharmacokinetic limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据