4.5 Article

Age-related differences in sleep-based memory consolidation: A meta-analysis

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 46-55

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.001

关键词

Aging; Sleep-based memory consolidation; Declarative memory; Procedural memory; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31300856, 31571111]
  2. Doctoral Fund of the Ministry of Education of China [20130182120013]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWU1509421]
  4. Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KLMH2015G05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A period of post-learning sleep benefits memory consolidation compared with an equal-length wake interval. However, whether this sleep-based memory consolidation changes as a function of age remains controversial. Here we report a meta-analysis that investigates the age differences in the sleep-based memory consolidation in two types of memory: declarative memory and procedural memory. The meta-analysis included 22 comparisons of the performance between young adults (N = 640) and older adults (N = 529) on behavioral tasks measuring sleep-based memory consolidation. Our results showed a significant overall sleep-based beneficial effect in young adults but not in older adults. However, further analyses suggested that the age differences were mainly manifested in sleep-based declarative memory consolidation but not in procedural memory consolidation. We discussed the possible underlying mechanisms for the age-related degradation in sleep-based memory consolidation. Further research is needed to determine the crucial components for sleep-related memory consolidation in older adults such as age-related changes in neurobiological and cardiovascular functions, which may play an important role in this context and have the potential to delineate the interrelationships between age-related changes in sleep and memory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据