4.5 Article

The involvement of multifunctional TGF-β and related cytokines in pathogenesis of endometriosis

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 31-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.10.011

关键词

Endometriosis; TGF-beta; Th cytokines; Peritoneal fluid; Serum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) is one of the major immune and inflammation factors responsible for regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, and immune responses. Deregulated TGF-beta activity, especially its influence in peritoneal cytokine cross-talk, has been implicated in pathologies of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether TGF-beta could be involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. For this purpose, we evaluated concentrations of TGF beta 1, TGF-beta 2, TGF-beta 3 and interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-21 and IL-22 in peritoneal fluid (PF) and serum of women with endometriosis. Methods: A total of 66 women of reproductive age were involved in the study, 51 endometriosis patients, and 15 women from the control group. PF and serum levels of all cytokines were measured with ELISA in women with or without endometriosis. Results: Higher PF and serum levels of TGF-beta 1, TGF-beta 2, TGF-beta 3, presented also as a total TGF-beta in women with endometriosis compared to control were observed. The biggest increase was measured in the case of TGF-beta 1. The higher levels of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-17 in PF and serum of endometriosis women than control was observed. Higher PF levels of studied parameters in comparison with serum levels were found. Conclusions: In endometriosis, TGF-beta could affect differentiation of T helper (Th) cells, hence produce more IL-17 and IL-10 to PF and might have an indirect influence on inflammation, which is associated with higher IL-1 beta and IL-6 levels. In consequent, TGF-beta in peritoneal fluid may promote an environment favorable to ectopic lesion formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据