期刊
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 216-224出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.003
关键词
Continued influence effect; Misinformation; Memory updating
资金
- University of Bristol
- ARC
- Royal Society
- Psychonomic Society
- RCUK from the EPSRC
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1629785] Funding Source: researchfish
- Medical Research Council [G0700238] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [G0700238] Funding Source: UKRI
It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the 'continued influence effect of misinformation' (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects' comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants' narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据