3.9 Article

Physico-Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradation Performance of Random Flax/Polylactic Acid and Unidirectional Flax/Polylactic Acid Biocomposites

期刊

FIBERS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fib6040098

关键词

PLA; flax; thermoplastic composites; mechanical properties; biodegradability; durability

资金

  1. Tilsatec Advanced Textile Materials (UK)
  2. Bangladesh University of Textiles, Bangladesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fully biodegradable flax/polylactic acid (PLA) thermoplastic composites were fabricated by using random (nonwoven mat) and aligned (unidirectional yarn) flax fiber as reinforcements (39% flax by volume) and Polylactic acid (PLA) as matrix. Results revealed that the aligned flax fibers have a greater reinforcing effect due to the uniform distribution of load axially along the fiber length in the composite. The aligned flax/PLA and random flax/PLA showed the tensile strength of (83.0 +/- 5.0) and (151.0 +/- 7.0) MPa respectively and flexural strength of (130.0 +/- 5.0) and (215.0 +/- 7.2) MPa respectively. Young's modulus of (9.3 +/- 1.5) and (18.5 +/- 2.0) GPa and flexural modulus of (9.9 +/- 1.0) and (18.8 +/- 1.0) GPa was attained for the random and unidirectional fiber composites, respectively. It was also found that both composite constituents, fiber and matrix, were degradable if buried in compost soil (ready soil after composting process), which is a distinctive advantage of the new composite structures. Remarkably, the biodegradation property of aligned flax fiber composites was significantly lower than random mat composites, possibly due to the less water swelling behavior of the aligned fiber composites. After 120 days burial test, the aligned flax/PLA composite displayed the reduction of 19% mass, residual flexural strength and modulus decreased by 57 and 50% respectively, while the random mat composites exhibited the loss of 27% mass, residual flexural strength and modulus declined by 80% at the same period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据