期刊
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 280-301出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfy005
关键词
-
资金
- University of Maryland Dean's Initiative Research Grant
- National Science Foundation [SES-1444721, SES-1444910]
The distinction between a person's ideological identity and their issue positions has come more clearly into focus in recent research. Scholars have pointed out a significant difference between identity-based and issue-based ideology in the American electorate. However, the affective and social effects of these separate elements of ideology have not been sufficiently explored. Drawing on a national sample collected by SSI and data from the 2016 ANES, this article finds that the identity-based elements of ideology are capable of driving heightened levels of affective polarization against outgroup ideologues, even at low levels of policy attitude extremity or constraint. These findings demonstrate how Americans can use ideological terms to disparage political opponents without necessarily holding constrained sets of policy attitudes.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据