4.5 Article

Neuronal loss, demyelination and volume change in the multiple sclerosis neocortex

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 377-390

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nan.12405

关键词

cortical pathology; neuronal loss; progressive multiple sclerosis

资金

  1. Higher Education Funding Council for England Clinical Senior Lectureship
  2. Barts Charity [468/1506]
  3. Parkinson&quot
  4. s UK [J-1402] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Indices of brain volume [grey matter, white matter (WM), lesions] are being used as outcomes in clinical trials of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the relationship between cortical volume, the number of neocortical neurons estimated using stereology and demyelination. Methods: Nine MS and seven control hemispheres were dissected into coronal slices. On sections stained for Giemsa, the cortex was outlined and optical disectors applied using systematic uniform random sampling. Neurons were counted using an oil immersion objective (9 60) following stereological principles. Grey and WM demyelination was outlined on myelin basic protein immunostained sections, and expressed as percentages of cortex and WM respectively. Results: In MS, the mean number of neurons was 14.9 +/- 1.9 billion vs. 24.4 +/- 2.4 billion in controls (P < 0.011), a 39% difference. The density of neurons was smaller by 28% (P < 0.001) and cortical volume by 26% (P = 0.1). Strong association was detected between number of neurons and cortical volume (P < 0.0001). Demyelination affected 40 +/- 13% of the MS neocortex and 9 +/- 12% of the WM, however, neither correlated with neuronal loss. Only weak association was detected between number of neurons and WM volume. Conclusion: Neocortical neuronal loss in MS is massive and strongly predicted by cortical volume. Cortical volume decline detected in vivo may be similarly indicative of neuronal loss. Lack of association between neuronal density and demyelination suggests these features are partially independent, at least in chronic MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据