4.8 Article

TDP-43 Depletion in Microglia Promotes Amyloid Clearance but Also Induces Synapse Loss

期刊

NEURON
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 297-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.037

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  2. Synapsis Foundation Alzheimer Research Switzerland ARS
  3. Velux Stiftung
  4. Cure Alzheimer Fund
  5. Sinergia grant
  6. SNF
  7. Forschungskredit University of Zurich
  8. Alzheimer's Research UK
  9. European Research Council
  10. MND Scotland
  11. Medical Research Council [11/ES/0022]
  12. Motor Neurone Disease Scotland
  13. European Research Council (ALZSYN)
  14. Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office
  15. Wellcome Trust-University of Edinburgh Institutional Strategic Support Fund
  16. Alzheimer's Society
  17. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-SPG2013-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. Alzheimer's Society [195] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglia coordinate various functions in the central nervous system ranging from removing synaptic connections, to maintaining brain homeostasis by monitoring neuronal function, and clearing protein aggregates across the lifespan. Here we investigated whether increased microglial phagocytic activity that clears amyloid can also cause pathological synapse loss. We identified TDP-43, a DNA-RNA binding protein encoded by the Tardbp gene, as a strong regulator of microglial phagocytosis. Mice lacking TDP-43 in microglia exhibit reduced amyloid load in a model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) but at the same time display drastic synapse loss, even in the absence of amyloid. Clinical examination from TDP-43 pathology cases reveal a considerably reduced prevalence of AD and decreased amyloid pathology compared to age-matched healthy controls, confirming our experimental results. Overall, our data suggest that dysfunctional microglia might play a causative role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, critically modulating the early stages of cognitive decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据