4.8 Article

Measurement and modeling of filament temperature distribution in the standoff gap between nozzle and bed in polymer-based additive manufacturing

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 224-231

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.030

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Polymer extrusion; Infrared thermography; Heat transfer analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dispensing of a polymer filament above its glass transition temperature is a critical step in several polymer-based additive manufacturing techniques. While the nozzle assembly heats up the filament prior to dispense, it is important to minimize cooling down of the filament in the standoff distance between the nozzle tip and bed. While heat transfer processes within the nozzle assembly, such as filament melting, and on the bed, such as thermally-driven filament-to-filament adhesion, have been well studied, there is a lack of work on heat transfer in the filament in the standoff region. This paper presents infrared thermography based measurement of temperature distribution in the filament in the standoff region, and an analytical model for heat transfer in this region. The analytical model, based on a balance between thermal advection and convective/radiative heat loss predicts an exponentially decaying temperature distribution, the nature of which is governed by the characteristic length, a parameter that combines multiple process parameters such as mass flowrate, filament diameter, heat capacity and cooling conditions. Experimental data in a wide range of process parameters are found to be in very good agreement with the analytical model. The thermal design space for ensuring minimal temperature drop in the standoff region is explored based on the analytical model. Experimental data and theoretical modeling presented here improve our fundamental understanding of heat transfer in polymer additive manufacturing, and may contribute towards design tools for thermal optimization of these processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据