4.3 Article

Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

NEUROMODULATION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 383-389

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12583

关键词

Cognitive; multiple sclerosis; remotely supervised; tDCS; telerehabilitation

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  2. Lourie Foundation, Inc.
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH111896] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) paired with cognitive training (CT) exercise in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS). MethodsIn a feasibility study of RS-tDCS in MS, participants completed ten sessions of tDCS paired with CT (1.5 mA x 20 min, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex montage). RS-tDCS participants were compared to a control group of adults with MS who underwent ten 20-min CT sessions through the same remotely supervised procedures. Cognitive outcomes were tested by composite scores measuring change in performance on standard tests (Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS or BICAMS), basic attention (ANT-I Orienting and Attention Networks, Cogstate Detection), complex attention (ANT-I Executive Network, Cogstate Identification and One-Back), and intra-individual response variability (ANT-I and Cogstate identification; sensitive markers of disease status). ResultsAfter ten sessions, the tDCS group (n=25) compared to the CT only group (n=20) had significantly greater improvement in complex attention (p=0.01) and response variability (p=0.01) composites. The groups did not differ in measures of basic attention (p=0.95) or standard cognitive measures (p=0.99). ConclusionsThese initial findings indicate benefit for RS-tDCS paired with CT in MS. Exploratory analyses indicate that the earliest tDCS cognitive benefit is seen in complex attention and response variability. Telerehabilitation using RS-tDCS combined with CT may lead to improved outcomes in MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据