4.7 Review

Chromatin remodeling and bivalent histone modifications in embryonic stem cells

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1609-1619

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201541011

关键词

chromatin; chromatin remodeling; embryonic stem cells; epigenetics; histone modifications

资金

  1. Nucleosome4D network
  2. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1252/12, 657/12]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [281781]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [281781] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by distinct epigenetic features including a relative enrichment of histone modifications related to active chromatin. Among these is tri-methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me3). Several thousands of the H3K4me3-enriched promoters in pluripotent cells also contain a repressive histone mark, namely H3K27me3, a situation referred to as bivalency. While bivalent promoters are not unique to pluripotent cells, they are relatively enriched in these cell types, largely marking developmental and lineage-specific genes which are silent but poised for immediate action. The H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications are catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases which are usually found within, although not entirely limited to, the Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes, respectively, but these do not provide selective bivalent specificity. Recent studies highlight the family of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins as regulators of bivalent domains. Here, we discuss bivalency in general, describe the machineries that catalyze bivalent chromatin domains, and portray the emerging connection between bivalency and the action of different families of chromatin remodelers, namely INO80, esBAF, and NuRD, in pluripotent cells. We posit that chromatin remodeling proteins may enable bivalent specificity, often selectively acting on, or selectively depleted from, bivalent domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据