4.3 Review

Safety Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke

期刊

NEUROMODULATION
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 215-222

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12574

关键词

Adverse effects; patient selection; safety; stroke; tDCS

资金

  1. Brazilian Funding Agency Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPQ) [233372/2014-8]
  2. University of Milano-Bicocca (FAR) [2015-ATE-0135]
  3. National Institute of Health (NIH) [5R21HD079048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe safety, painless, and tolerability features of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have prompted the research on the therapeutic effects of this technique in stroke; however, an in-depth and unarguable examination of the adverse effects of tDCS in stroke patients is still lacking. This review analyzes the reported adverse effects in stroke, looking for factors that may induce side-effects. Materials and MethodsA comprehensive search of articles published from 1998 to 2015 describing tDCS application in stroke patients performed through data extraction from MEDLINE/PubMed database. ResultsOnly 11.62% of published papers reported the occurrence of tDCS adverse effects in stroke patients. The most common was itching (70%), followed by burning sensation (40%), headache (40%), tingling (30%), sleepiness (20%), difficulty of concentration, mild fatigue, skin redness, and dizziness (10%). No significant difference was found between studies Reporting vs. Non-reporting adverse effects regarding tDCS parameters (intensity, current density, duration of stimulation, and number of sessions). ConclusionIn the majority of stroke patients, tDCS did not induce any severe adverse effect. Regrettably, many published papers did not provide a careful description of exclusion criteria, nor a systematic report of side effects. Our work emphasizes the need of a more meticulous description of the adopted exclusion criteria and of the induced adverse effects, in order to optimize the therapeutic use of tDCS and to better delineate its safety parameters in stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据