4.7 Article

Serum magnesium is associated with the risk of dementia

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 89, 期 16, 页码 1716-1722

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004517

关键词

-

资金

  1. Erasmus MC
  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  5. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE)
  6. Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  8. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports
  9. European Commission (DG XII)
  10. Municipality of Rotterdam

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:To determine if serum magnesium levels are associated with the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer disease.Methods:Within the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study, we measured serum magnesium levels in 9,569 participants, free from dementia at baseline (1997-2008). Participants were subsequently followed up for incident dementia, determined according to the DSM-III-R criteria, until January 1, 2015. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to associate quintiles of serum magnesium with incident all-cause dementia. We used the third quintile as a reference group and adjusted for age, sex, Rotterdam Study cohort, educational level, cardiovascular risk factors, kidney function, comorbidities, other electrolytes, and diuretic use.Results:Our study population had a mean age of 64.9 years and 56.6% were women. During a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 823 participants were diagnosed with all-cause dementia. Both low serum magnesium levels (0.79 mmol/L) and high serum magnesium levels (0.90 mmol/L) were associated with an increased risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.69, and HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.67, respectively).Conclusions:Both low and high serum magnesium levels are associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia. Our results warrant replication in other population-based studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据