4.7 Article

Nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables and cognitive decline: Prospective study

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 E214-E222

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004815

关键词

-

资金

  1. USDA Agricultural Research Service [58-1950-7-707]
  2. [R01 AG031553]
  3. [R01 AG17917]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo increase understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the association, we investigated the individual relations to cognitive decline of the primary nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables, including vitamin K (phylloquinone), lutein, -carotene, nitrate, folate, kaempferol, and -tocopherol.MethodsThis was a prospective study of 960 participants of the Memory and Aging Project, ages 58-99 years, who completed a food frequency questionnaire and had 2 cognitive assessments over a mean 4.7 years.ResultsIn a linear mixed model adjusted for age, sex, education, participation in cognitive activities, physical activities, smoking, and seafood and alcohol consumption, consumption of green leafy vegetables was associated with slower cognitive decline; the decline rate for those in the highest quintile of intake (median 1.3 servings/d) was slower by = 0.05 standardized units (p = 0.0001) or the equivalent of being 11 years younger in age. Higher intakes of each of the nutrients and bioactives except -carotene were individually associated with slower cognitive decline. In the adjusted models, the rates for the highest vs the lowest quintiles of intake were = 0.02, p = 0.002 for phylloquinone; = 0.04, p = 0.002 for lutein; = 0.05, p < 0.001 for folate; = 0.03, p = 0.02 for -tocopherol; = 0.04, p = 0.002 for nitrate; = 0.04, p = 0.003 for kaempferol; and = 0.02, p = 0.08 for -carotene.ConclusionsConsumption of approximately 1 serving per day of green leafy vegetables and foods rich in phylloquinone, lutein, nitrate, folate, -tocopherol, and kaempferol may help to slow cognitive decline with aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据