4.7 Article

Deconstruction of O-glycosylation-GalNAc-T isoforms direct distinct subsets of the O-glycoproteome

期刊

EMBO REPORTS
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1713-1722

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embr.201540796

关键词

apolipoproteins; dimethylation; GALNT; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Danish Research Councils (Sapere Aude Research Talent Grant)
  2. Mizutani Foundation
  3. Kirsten og Freddy Johansen Fonden
  4. A.P. Moller og Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Mollers Fond til Almene Formaal
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  6. program of excellence from the University of Copenhagen [CDO2016]
  7. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GalNAc-type O-glycosylation is found on most proteins trafficking through the secretory pathway in metazoan cells. The O-glycoproteome is regulated by up to 20 polypeptide GalNAc-Ts and the contributions and biological functions of individual GalNAc-Ts are poorly understood. Here, we used a zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN)-directed knockout strategy to probe the contributions of the major GalNAc-Ts (GalNAc-T1 and GalNAc-T2) in liver cells and explore how the GalNAc-T repertoire quantitatively affects the O-glycoproteome. We demonstrate that the majority of the O-glycoproteome is covered by redundancy, whereas distinct subsets of substrates are modified by non-redundant functions of GalNAc-T1 and GalNAc-T2. The non-redundant O-glycoproteome subsets and specific transcriptional responses for each isoform are related to different cellular processes; for the GalNAc-T2 isoform, these support a role in lipid metabolism. The results demonstrate that GalNAc-Ts have different non-redundant glycosylation functions, which may affect distinct cellular processes. The data serves as acomprehensive resource for unique GalNAc-T substrates. Our study provides a new view of the differential regulation of the O-glycoproteome, suggesting that the plurality of GalNAc-Ts arose to regulate distinct protein functions and cellular processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据