4.7 Article

Disease-modifying therapies modulate retinal atrophy in multiple sclerosis A retrospective study

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 88, 期 6, 页码 525-532

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003582

关键词

-

资金

  1. Race to Erase MS
  2. NIH [5R01NS082347-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To retrospectively investigate whether disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) exert differential effects on rates of retinal atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), as assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: A total of 402 patients with RRMS followed at the Johns Hopkins MS Center who underwent Cirrus-HD OCT were assessed for eligibility. Inclusion criteria included at least 1 year of OCT follow-up and adherence to a single DMT during the period of follow-up. Combined thickness of the ganglion cell 1 inner plexiform (GCIP) and other retinal layers was computed utilizing automated macular segmentation. Retinal thickness changes were analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression. Results: The effects of glatiramer acetate (GA; n=48), natalizumab (NAT; n=46), and interferonb- 1a subcutaneously (IFNSC; n=35) and intramuscularly (IFNIM; n=28) were assessed. Baseline analyses revealed no significant differences between groups in terms of age, sex, optic neuritis history, or follow-up duration. During follow-up, relative to NAT-treated patients, IFNSC-and GAtreated patients exhibited 0.37 mu m/y (p, 0.001) and 0.14 mu m/y (p=0.035) faster rates of GCIP thinning, respectively, adjusting for the interval between initiation of DMT and OCT monitoring (gap time), age, sex, relapses, and disease duration. In the IFNSC group, GCIP thinning was 1.53 mm/y faster during the first year of therapy vs during the time interval afterwards (p<0.001). Conclusions: Rates of GCIP atrophy in patients with RRMS vary according to DMT utilization. Our findings support OCT for monitoring neurodegenerative treatment effects in the retina, an easily accessible tissue, and as a practical outcome measure in RRMS clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据