3.8 Article

Granulocyte-Colony-Stimulating Factor Alters the Proteomic Landscape of the Ventral Tegmental Area

期刊

PROTEOMES
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/proteomes6040035

关键词

cocaine; addiction; cytokine; neuroimmune; ventral tegmental area

资金

  1. Yale/NIDA Neuroproteomic Center Grant from NIDA [P30-DA018343]
  2. NIDA [DA044308, DA042111]
  3. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  4. Whitehall Foundation
  5. Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Foundation
  6. Friedman Brain Institute
  7. Leon Levy Foundation
  8. Seaver Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cocaine addiction is characterized by aberrant plasticity of the mesolimbic dopamine circuit, leading to dysregulation of motivation to seek and take drug. Despite the significant toll that cocaine use disorder exacts on society, there are currently no available pharmacotherapies. We have recently identified granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a soluble cytokine that alters the behavioral response to cocaine and which increases dopamine release from the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Despite these known effects on behavior and neurophysiology, the molecular mechanisms by which G-CSF affects brain function are unclear. In this study mice were treated with repeated injections of G-CSF, cocaine or a combination and changes in protein expression in the VTA were examined using an unbiased proteomics approach. Repeated G-CSF treatment resulted in alterations in multiple signaling pathways related to synaptic plasticity and neuronal morphology. While the treatment groups had marked overlap in their effect, injections of cocaine and the combination of cocaine and G-CSF lead to distinct patterns of significantly regulated proteins. These experiments provide valuable information as to the molecular pathways that G-CSF activates in an important limbic brain region and will help to guide further characterization of G-CSF function and evaluation as a possible translational target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据