4.0 Article

Blood pressure reactivity at onset of mental stress determines sympathetic vascular response in young adults

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 6, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13944

关键词

Baroreflex sensitivity; mental stress; muscle sympathetic nerve activity; sex differences

资金

  1. National Health AMP
  2. Medical Research Council of Australia [GTN1029782, GTN11000420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown in young males that the rate of rise in blood pressure (BP) at the onset of mental stress determines whether or not muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) has a role in driving the pressor response. The aim of this study was to investigate these interactions in young females. BP and MSNA were recorded continuously in 19 females and 21 males during 2-min mental stressors (mental arithmetic and Stroop test). Physical stressor tasks (cold pressor, handgrip exercise, postexercise ischemia) were also per- formed. During the first minute of mental arithmetic, the rate of rise in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly greater in negative responders (mean decrease in MSNA) compared with positive responders (mean increase in MSNA) in both males (1.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.3 mmHg/sec) and females (1.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.5 +/- 0.2 mmHg/sec). For the Stroop test, there was no significant difference in the rate of the rise in BP between positive and negative responders (P > 0.05). However, peak changes in MAP were significantly greater in negative responders compared with positive responders in both males (22 +/- 6 vs. 13 +/- 3 mmHg) and females (12 +/- 2 vs. 6 +/- 1 mmHg). Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was greater in negative responders and may contribute to the fall in MSNA experienced by these individuals during mental stress. During physical stressors there were consistent increases in BP and MSNA in males and females. The findings suggest that, in both males and females, BP reactivity at the onset of mental stress dictates whether or not there is an increase or decrease in MSNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据