4.5 Article

miR-23b promotes cutaneous wound healing through inhibition of the inflammatory responses by targeting ASK1

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA SINICA
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 1104-1113

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/abbs/gmy109

关键词

wound healing; miR-23b; inflammation; keratinocytes; ASK1

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81770856, 81573068]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [H2015081]
  3. China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wound healing is a complicated event that develops in three overlapping phases: inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been proved to play an important role in the healing process of skin trauma, and alteration of specific miRNA expression during different phases may be associated with abnormal wound healing. In this study, we determined the variation of miR-23b expression after trauma in normal mice and in cultured cells exposed to lipopolysaccharide. We further demonstrated that excessive miR-23b could significantly accelerate wound healing in vivo. Up-regulation of miR-23b decreases infiltration of inflammatory cells, as evidenced by pathologic staining. Meanwhile, miR-23b could significantly inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, and Ccl2, and significantly increase anti-inflammatory factor IL-10. Furthermore, miR-23b could also promote alpha-SMA expression in a fiber pattern and increase the expression of Col1a1 and Col3a1. Importantly, we also showed that miR-23b could inhibit inflammation to promote wound healing by targeting apoptotic signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1). Notably, knockdown of ASK1 could reduce inflammation factor expression in vitro. Together, our data reveal that miR-23b is a potent therapeutic agent for cutaneous wound healing that shortens the period of inflammatory responses and promotes keratinocyte migration for the re-epithelialization of wound sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据