4.3 Article

Multi-Table Differential Correlation Analysis of Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Interactions in Turner Syndrome

期刊

NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 81-93

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-017-9351-z

关键词

Permutation tests; Multi-table analysis; Sparse canonical correlation analysis; Turner syndrome; Tensor-based morphometry; Cognitive abilities

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [146281, 158500]
  2. France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies
  3. Gazit-Globe Post-Doctoral Fellowship Award
  4. NICHD [HD049653]
  5. NIMH [MH099630]
  6. Sharon Levine Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Girls and women with Turner syndrome (TS) have a completely or partially missing X chromosome. Extensive studies on the impact of TS on neuroanatomy and cognition have been conducted. The integration of neuroanatomical and cognitive information into one consistent analysis through multi-table methods is difficult and most standard tests are underpowered. We propose a new two-sample testing procedure that compares associations between two tables in two groups. The procedure combines multi-table methods with permutation tests. In particular, we construct cluster size test statistics that incorporate spatial dependencies. We apply our new procedure to a newly collected dataset comprising of structural brain scans and cognitive test scores from girls with TS and healthy control participants (age and sex matched). We measure neuroanatomy with Tensor-Based Morphometry (TBM) and cognitive function with Wechsler IQ and NEuroPSYchological tests (NEPSY-II). We compare our multi-table testing procedure to a single-table analysis. Our new procedure reports differential correlations between two voxel clusters and a wide range of cognitive tests whereas the single-table analysis reports no differences. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that girls with TS have a different brain-cognition association structure than healthy controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据