4.8 Article

Adaptation of avian influenza A (H6N1) virus from avian to human receptor-binding preference

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 1661-1673

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201590960

关键词

crystal structure; H6N1; hemagglutinin; receptor binding

资金

  1. China Ministry of Science and Technology National 973 Project [2011CB504703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31402196]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB08020100]
  4. Intramural Special Grant for Influenza Virus Research from the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-L09]
  5. China National Grand S&T Special Project [2014ZX10004002]
  6. NSFC Innovative Research Group [81321063]
  7. Excellent Young Scientist Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The receptor-binding specificity of influenza A viruses is a major determinant for the host tropism of the virus, which enables inter-species transmission. In 2013, the first human case of infection with avian influenza A (H6N1) virus was reported in Taiwan. To gather evidence concerning the epidemic potential of H6 subtype viruses, we performed comprehensive analysis of receptor-binding properties of Taiwan-isolated H6 HAs from 1972 to 2013. We propose that the receptor-binding properties of Taiwan-isolated H6 HAs have undergone three major stages: initially avian receptor-binding preference, secondarily obtaining human receptor-binding capacity, and recently human receptor-binding preference, which has been confirmed by receptor-binding assessment of three representative virus isolates. Mutagenesis work revealed that E190V and G228S substitutions are important to acquire the human receptor-binding capacity, and the P186L substitution could reduce the binding to avian receptor. Further structural analysis revealed how the P186L substitution in the receptor-binding site of HA determines the receptor-binding preference change. We conclude that the human-infecting H6N1 evolved into a human receptor preference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据