4.2 Article

The Influence of Verbal Instruction on Measurement Reliability and Explosive Neuromuscular Performance of the Knee Extensors

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 21-34

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP ZOO
DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0031

关键词

maximal force; force development; electromyography; neuromuscular performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study aimed to examine the effect of verbal instruction on explosive force production and between-session measurement reliability during maximal voluntary contractions of knee extensors. Following familiarization, 20 healthy males performed 3 maximal contractions with a hard-and-fast instruction and 3 maximal contractions with a fast instruction during 2 test-retest sessions. Knee extension maximal voluntary force (F-max) and the maximal rate of force development (RFDmax) were measured. Maximal electromechanical delay (EMDmax), and the maximal rate of muscle activation (RMA(max)) of quadriceps muscles were determined. No significant effect of instruction was observed on F-max (p > 0.05). The RFDmax and RMA(max) were significantly higher with the fast compared to the hard-and-fast instruction (36.07%, ES = 1.99 and 37.24%, ES = 0.92, respectively), whereas EMDmax was significantly lower with the fast instruction compared to the hard-and-fast instruction (-3.79%, ES = -0.29). No significant differences between test and retest measurements were found (p < 0.05). However, the reliability of the RFDmax was higher with the fast instruction compared to the hard-and-fast instruction (CV: 7.3 vs. 16.2%; ICC: 0.84 vs. 0.56). Besides, the RFDmax was associated with the RMA(max) and EMDmax with a significant effect of instruction. Data showed that the instruction given prior contracting muscle affected explosive force production and associated neuromuscular variables. As a result, the fast instruction may be preferred in the assessment of explosive force capacity of skeletal muscle during maximal efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据