4.6 Article

Robust unsupervised feature selection via matrix factorization

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 115-127

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.034

关键词

Unsupervised feature selection; Matrix factorization; Manifold regularization; l(2,1)-norm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61175012, 61473214]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China [1208RJZA265]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110211110026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dimensionality reduction is a challenging task for high-dimensional data processing in machine learning and data mining. It can help to reduce computation time, save storage space and improve the performance of learning algorithms. As an effective dimension reduction technique, unsupervised feature selection aims at finding a subset of features to retain the most relevant information. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised feature selection method, called Robust Unsupervised Feature Selection via Matrix Factorization (RUFSM), in which robust discriminative feature selection and robust clustering are performed simultaneously under l(2),(1)-norm while the local manifold structures of data are preserved. The advantages of this work are three-fold. Firstly, both the latent orthogonal cluster centers and the sparse representation of the projected data points based on matrix factorization are predicted for selecting robust discriminative features. Secondly, the feature selection and the clustering are performed simultaneously to guarantee an overall optimum. Thirdly, an efficient iterative update algorithm, which is based on Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM), is used for RUFSM optimization. Compared with several state-of-the-art unsupervised feature selection methods, the proposed algorithm comes with better clustering performance for almost all datasets we have experimented with here. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据