4.8 Article

α-synuclein assemblies sequester neuronal α3-Na+/K+-ATPase and impair Na+ gradient

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 19, 页码 2408-2423

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201591397

关键词

misfolding disease; Parkinson's disease; protein aggregation and clustering; single particle tracking; super-resolution imaging

资金

  1. AgenceNationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-MNPS-013-01, ANR-11-BSV8-021-01]
  2. ERC [ANR-10-LABX-54]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-MNPS-013-01, ANR-11-BSV8-021-01]
  4. ERC advanced research grant PlasltInhib, program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-LABX-54, ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  5. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM), France Alzheimer [R12035JJ]
  6. Coup d'Elan a la Recherche Francaise award from Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  7. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn) assemblies can be up-taken by neurons; however, their interaction with the plasma membrane and proteins has not been studied specifically. Here we demonstrate that alpha-syn assemblies form clusters within the plasma membrane of neurons. Using a proteomic-based approach, we identify the alpha 3-subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) as a cell surface partner of alpha-syn assemblies. The interaction strength depended on the state of alpha-syn, fibrils being the strongest, oligomers weak, and monomers none. Mutations within the neuron-specific alpha 3-subunit are linked to rapid-onset dystonia Parkinsonism (RDP) and alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC). We show that freely diffusing alpha 3-NKA are trapped within alpha-syn clusters resulting in alpha 3-NKA redistribution and formation of larger nanoclusters. This creates regions within the plasma membrane with reduced local densities of alpha 3-NKA, thereby decreasing the efficiency of Na+ extrusion following stimulus. Thus, interactions of alpha 3-NKA with extracellular alpha-syn assemblies reduce its pumping activity as its mutations in RDP/AHC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据