3.8 Article

Utilization of Institutional Delivery Service in a Predominantly Pastoralist Community of Northeast Ethiopia

期刊

ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 403-412

出版社

JIMMA UNIV, ETHIOPIA
DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i4.6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Mekelle University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality is high in sub-Saharan Africa, and most deaths occur around childbirth. In Ethiopia, most births happen at home without skilled delivery attendants, and particularly, the least utilization of skilled delivery is recorded in Afar Region. The factors that influence this utilization are not well documented in the region where utilization has been low. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of utilization of institutional delivery and associated factors. METHODS: A cross-section study with pretested structural questionnaire was conducted from August 5 to September 27, 2015, among women who gave birth within 24 months preceding the survey. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify factors associated with utilization of institutional delivery. RESULTS: Out of the total 1842 women, only 339(18.4%) of mothers reported having delivered their youngest child at a health facility. Home delivery was preferred due to cultural norms, lowrisk perception, and distance from a health facility. The odds of delivering in a health facility were higher for mothers who attended at least four antenatal visits during the index pregnancy (AOR=3.08,95% CI=1.91-4.96), those whose husbands were educated to secondary school (AOR=1.86, 95% CI=1.34-2.60), and those that had at least secondary school level education themselves (AOR=1.52, 95% CI=1.03-2.23). CONCLUSION: Utilization of institution delivery among Afar communities is very low, and less educated mothers are lagging behind. Women's education and full attendance to antenatal care can help increase utilization of skilled delivery services. Qualitative studies to identify socio-cultural barriers are also essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据