4.7 Article

Human COMT over-expression confers a heightened susceptibility to dyskinesia in mice

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 133-139

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.03.006

关键词

L-DOPA; LID; Abnormal involuntary movements; TXNRD2; COMT; ARVCF 2; 2q11.2; Dopamine; Striatum

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2016-48532-R, PCIN-2015-098]
  2. Sanidad Politica Social e Igualdad (ISCIII) [CIBERNED CB06/05/0055]
  3. SECITI from Mexico [037-2016]
  4. CONACYT
  5. SECITI
  6. [RO1MH99660]
  7. [U54HD090260]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) degrades dopamine and its precursor L-DOPA and plays a critical role in regulating synaptic dopamine actions. We investigated the effects of heightened levels of COMT on dopamine regulated motor behaviors and molecular alterations in a mouse model of dyskinesia. Transgenic mice overexpressing human COMT (TG) and their wildtype (WT) littermates received unilateral 6-OHDA lesions in the dorsal striatum and were treated chronically with L-DOPA for two weeks. L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia was exacerbated in TG mice without altering L-DOPA motor efficacy as determined by contralateral rotations or motor coordination. Inductions of FosB and phospho-acetylated histone 3 (molecular correlates of dyskinesia) were potentiated in the lesioned striatum of TG mice compared with their WT littermates. The TG mice had lower basal levels of dopamine in the striatum. In mice with lesions, L-DOPA induces a greater increase in the dopamine metabolite 3-methoxytyramine in the lesioned striatum of dyskinetic TG mice than in WT mice. The levels of serotonin and its metabolite were similar in TG and WT mice. Our results demonstrate that human COMT overexpression confers a heightened susceptibility to L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and alters molecular and neurochemical responses in the lesioned striatum of mice. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据