4.5 Article

The miRNome of Alzheimer's disease: consistent downregulation of the miR-132/212 cluster

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.09.019

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Human cortical brain tissue; microRNA; mRNA; Hsa-miR-132; Hsa-miR-212

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) National Genome Research Network (NGFN) [01GS08125]
  2. Helmholtz Alliance for Mental Health in an Aging Society (HELMA) [Ha-15]
  3. AXA Research Fund
  4. Fondation Universite Pierre et MarieCurie
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer, Paris, France
  6. program Investissements d'avenir [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules, with essential functions in RNA silencing and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. miRNAs appear to regulate the development and function of the nervous system. Alterations of miRNA expression have been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). To characterize the AD miRNA signature, we examined genome-wide miRNA and mRNA expression patterns in the temporal cortex of AD and control samples. We validated our miRNA results by semiquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in independent prefrontal cortex. Furthermore, we separated gray and white matter brain sections to identify the cellular origin of the altered miRNA expression. We observed genome-wide downregulation of hsa-miR-132-3p and hsa-miR-212-3p in AD with a stronger decrease in gray matter AD samples. We further identified 10 differently expressed transcripts achieving genome-wide levels of significance. Significantly deregulated miRNAs and mRNAs were correlated and examined for potential binding sites (in silico). This miRNome-wide study in AD provides supportive evidence and corroborates an important contribution of miR-132/212 and corresponding target mRNAs to the pathogenesis of AD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据